Development doctrines of Romania. Is the synchronist thesis a development doctrine? A very short comparative analysis

This is a short paper on some very important issues: the doctrinal aspects of development of a country like Romania. The type of the dominant doctrine makes the difference between underdevelopment – that is poverty of the majority, and development – that is, citizenship awareness into the road of welfare. The main aim is to underline some key differences between the Lovinescu’s thesis of Synchronism and the rest, generally named under the umbrella of autochtonist doctrines – only briefly mentioned. It is short not because I do not have the means to develop on the subject matter but because there is the essence imperative: to understand in order to choose one direction or another. The essence is brief, like the time we are willing to invest in reading. Details, after we choose to be free as citizens with full self-awareness.